Determination of Zones exposed to Arsenical Water and CERHA prevalence in Villa Belgrano, Tucumán, Argentina

Authors

  • Silvina Gerstenfeld Dirección General de Salud Ambiental, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Alicia Jordán Dirección de Epidemiología, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Rogelio Calli Dirección de Epidemiología, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Patricia Farías Dirección de Red de Servicios, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Juan Malica Dirección de Red de Servicios, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • María Laura Gómez Peña Dirección de Red de Servicios, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Lorena Aguirre Dirección de Red de Servicios, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Mariela Salvatierra Dirección de Red de Servicios, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Elizabeth Leguizamón Dirección de Red de Servicios, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • César Coronel Dirección General de Salud Ambiental, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán
  • Emilio Flores Ivaldi Departamento de Informática, Sistema Provincial de Salud, Tucumán

Keywords:

Arsenic, Prevalence, Tucumán, Biomarkers

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In Tucumán, the arsenic concentration in water fluctuates between 0,1 and 0,01 ppm. The provincial health system does not have any record of cases. OBJECTIVES: To identify and create a map of environmental risk, estimating also chronic endemic regional hydroarsenicism (CERHA) prevalence in Villa Belgrano and exploring the relation between arsenic concentration in water and clinical manifestations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed. All water sources were analyzed and 119 adults were randomly selected. The definition of case considered the own criteria, which differed from the ones of World Health Organization (WHO) regarding arsenic concentration in water, urine and hair as well as time of consumption. The study criteria is most sensible in arsenic water concentration. Those who had consumed water with more than 0.01 parts per million (ppm) for over 5 years and presented more than 3 ug/g in hair and/or more than 40 ug/g in urine with compatible clinical signs were considered as cases. RESULTS: 75 % of water sources had arsenic levels higher than 0.01 ppm. According to the WHO criteria, there were 51 probable cases and there was not any defined case. According to the study criteria, there were 3 defined cases with a prevalence of 2.6%. The study did not find an association between with non-cutaneous or serious cutaneous injuries and arsenic level in water higher than 0.01 ppm. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence estimated according to the study criteria was similar to the one established in the bibliography under the same conditions, though with other criteria which are not comparable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

01-03-2012

How to Cite

Gerstenfeld , S. ., Jordán, A. ., Calli , R., Farías , P. ., Malica , J. ., Gómez Peña , M. L., … Flores Ivaldi , E. . (2012). Determination of Zones exposed to Arsenical Water and CERHA prevalence in Villa Belgrano, Tucumán, Argentina. Revista Argentina De Salud Pública, 3(10), 24–29. Retrieved from https://rasp.msal.gov.ar/index.php/rasp/article/view/359